Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Sci. Aging Knowl. Environ., 22 June 2005
Vol. 2005, Issue 25, p. pe18
[DOI: 10.1126/sageke.2005.25.pe18]


Endothelial Progenitor Cell Therapy for Atherosclerosis: The Philosopher's Stone for an Aging Population?

Julia Kravchenko, Pascal J. Goldschmidt-Clermont, Tiffany Powell, Eric Stallard, Igor Akushevich, Michael S. Cuffe, and Kenneth G. Manton

The authors are at the Center for Demographic Studies at Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA (J.K., E.S., I.A., and K.G.M) and in the Department of Medicine at Duke Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA (P.J.G.-C., T.P., and M.S.C). E-mail: krauchanka{at} (J.K.)

Key Words: atherosclerosis • cardiovascular disease mortality • endothelial progenitor cells • risk factor intervention • microsimulation

Abstract: Much of the increased risk for atherosclerosis progression with age may be a result of age-related declines in the capacity of precursor cells to repair damage in the arterial endothelium. To estimate the impact of progenitor cell therapy for atherosclerosis on cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality, life expectancy, and survival, as compared with the lifetime control of conventional risk factors, we modeled the health effects of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cell therapy using data from the 1950 to 1996 follow-up of the Framingham Heart Study. To model cardiovascular disease mortality, we assumed that progenitor cell therapy was applied at age 30, with the effect assumed to be a 10-year delay in atherosclerosis progression. Age projections were constructed analytically using the stochastic process model for risk factor dynamics and mortality and microsimulation techniques. We considered three types of interventions: (i) keeping risk factors within selected limits to model current clinical recommendations; (ii) an age shift of 10 years to model the effects of progenitor cell therapy; and (iii) elimination of a competing risk (such as cancer). Our study suggests that progenitor cell therapy might increase life expectancy in the population as much as the complete elimination of cancer (in females, an additional 3.67 versus 3.37 years; in males, an additional 5.94 versus 2.86 years, respectively).

Citation: J. Kravchenko, P. J. Goldschmidt-Clermont, T. Powell, E. Stallard, I. Akushevich, M. S. Cuffe, K. G. Manton, Endothelial Progenitor Cell Therapy for Atherosclerosis: The Philosopher's Stone for an Aging Population? Sci. Aging Knowl. Environ. 2005 (25), pe18 (2005).

Read the Full Text

NIH funding trajectories and their correlations with US health dynamics from 1950 to 2004.
K. G. Manton, X.-L. Gu, G. Lowrimore, A. Ullian, and H. D. Tolley (2009)
PNAS 106, 10981-10986
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »

To Advertise     Find Products

Science of Aging Knowledge Environment. ISSN 1539-6150