Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.

Subscribe

SAGE KE Bulletin Board

RE: Ethics of and motivation for aging cure

29 May 2002

Alex F Bokov

Well put, sir!

The only thing that I can add is if a 'cure to aging' has no moral or economic benefit, then neither does a cure to anything else. "Why cure cancer? Why cure heart disease? People will get ill from some other cause anyway and if they don't, why that's bad too because then there will be unemployement?!"

To me, it's axiomatic that human life is worth prolonging. I hope I never rise so high above the legacy handed down to me by evolution to ever think otherwise.

Is it really the consequences of life prolongation we're worried about? Or are we worried about having to rethink the comfortable (if pessimistic) view of life and health we've resigned ourselves to?


To Advertise     Find Products


Science of Aging Knowledge Environment. ISSN 1539-6150